Grandio Flow
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet

IFU Link
Claim 1: filling minimally invasive cavities of all classes
Claim 2: filling small class I cavities
Claim 3: extended fissure sealing
Claim 4: filling class II cavities
Claim 5: filling class III cavities
Claim 6: filling class IV cavities
Claim 7: filling class V cavities including V-shaped defects and cervical caries
Claim 8: Blocking out undercuts
Claim 9: lining or coating cavities
Claim 10: Repairing veneers
Claim 11: repairing fillings
Claim 12: luting translucent prosthetic pieces

 
 
 

Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
(c) RCHSR
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
Claim 3:
Oba AA, Sönmez IS, Ercan E, Dülgergil T. Comparison of retention rates of fissure sealants using two flowable restorative materials and a conventional resin sealant: two-year follow-up. Med Princ Pract. 2012;21(3):234-7.
Claim 7:
Karaman E, Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. Clinical evaluation of a nanohybrid and a flowable resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions: 24-month results. J Adhes Dent. 2012 Aug;14(5):485-92.

Claims 1 - 6, 8- 12:
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0